LawCite Advocates

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India rules prohibit advocates from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. By accessing this website, the user acknowledges it is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer-client relationship.

By clicking I Agree, you confirm you have read and understood this disclaimer and wish to proceed.

PracticeThe FirmPeopleInsightsContactEnquire
← All Insights
Corporate Law

Limitation of Liability for Shipowners Under the Merchant Shipping Act

Author: Adv. Vippin Sharma Published: November 2025 Read: 7 min read

One of the most important and distinctive features of maritime law is the right of a shipowner to limit their liability for maritime claims to a fixed amount, regardless of the actual loss caused. This right of limitation exists in most major maritime nations and reflects a historical policy of protecting shipowners from unlimited liability arising from casualties at sea.

In India, the right to limit liability is governed by Part XA of the Merchant Shipping Act 1958, which incorporates the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976 (LLMC 1976) as amended by the 1996 Protocol.

What Claims Can Be Limited

The right to limit applies to claims arising from loss of life or personal injury, loss of or damage to property, loss resulting from delay in delivery, and certain other economic losses, where these occur in connection with the operation of the vessel. Claims for salvage remuneration, wreck removal costs, and certain pollution claims may be subject to separate limitation regimes.

Not all claims can be limited. Claims for crew wages cannot be limited. Claims arising from the personal act or omission of the shipowner committed with intent to cause the loss, or recklessly with knowledge that the loss would probably result, cannot be limited. This latter exception — breaking the limitation — is the subject of most limitation disputes.

The Limitation Amount

The limitation amount is calculated by reference to the tonnage of the vessel and expressed in Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), the international monetary unit of the IMF. The applicable limits depend on the vessel's gross tonnage, with higher tonnage vessels having higher but proportionally lower limits. The 1996 Protocol substantially increased the limits compared to the original 1976 Convention.

Separate limits apply to claims for loss of life and personal injury, and to claims for property damage. Where a vessel's total liability for all claims exceeds the applicable limit, the limitation fund is constituted and distributed among all claimants in proportion to their established claims.

The Bombay High Court affirmed in 2025 that the right to limit liability under the Merchant Shipping Act is absolute and that the court cannot override the statutory limitation framework even where it might seem inequitable to do so in a particular case. This confirms that claimants seeking to recover losses above the limitation amount face a high threshold in Indian proceedings.

Constituting a Limitation Fund

A shipowner seeking to limit their liability applies to the relevant High Court to constitute a limitation fund. The fund is constituted by depositing the limitation amount in cash or providing acceptable security with the court. Once the fund is constituted, all claims subject to limitation must be brought against the fund, and claimants cannot pursue the shipowner's other assets.

The procedure is set out in Section 352-C of the Merchant Shipping Act. The High Court determines the amount of the shipowner's liability, requires the deposit of the limitation amount, and then supervises the distribution of the fund among the claimants.

Breaking Limitation

A claimant who wants to recover above the limitation amount must establish that the loss resulted from the personal act or omission of the shipowner, committed with intent to cause the loss or recklessly with knowledge that the loss would probably result. This is a very high standard. It requires proof of actual intent to cause the loss or conscious risk-taking of a very serious kind.

In practice, limitation is rarely successfully broken. Courts are reluctant to find that a shipowner personally intended to cause the loss or acted with the required level of recklessness, absent very clear evidence of deliberate or grossly reckless conduct at the highest level of the shipowning organisation.

P&I Insurance and Limitation

Shipowners typically carry Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurance through a P&I Club, which covers third-party liabilities including cargo damage, personal injury, and pollution. P&I Club cover is generally subject to the shipowner's right of limitation, and the Club will typically support the shipowner's limitation proceedings as part of handling the claim.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice specific to your situation, please consult a qualified legal professional. LawCite Advocates is a law firm registered in India.

Discuss your
legal matter.

Request a Consultation

As per the Bar Council of India Rules, LawCite Advocates is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.