LawCite Advocates

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India rules prohibit advocates from advertising or soliciting work in any form or manner. By accessing this website, the user acknowledges it is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create a lawyer-client relationship.

By clicking I Agree, you confirm you have read and understood this disclaimer and wish to proceed.

PracticeThe FirmPeopleInsightsContactEnquire
← All Insights
Corporate Law

Limitation Periods for Commercial Disputes in India: A Practical Guide

Author: Adv. Vippin Sharma Published: March 2026 Read: 7 min read

Limitation periods are among the most consequential and most overlooked aspects of commercial litigation in India. A perfectly valid claim can be permanently barred simply because proceedings were not initiated within the applicable limitation period. This article sets out the key periods relevant to commercial disputes, when time starts to run, and how to protect a claim from becoming time-barred.

The Governing Framework

Limitation in India is governed principally by the Limitation Act, 1963. The Act prescribes time limits for different types of claims in a schedule, and also contains provisions dealing with when time begins to run, how it can be extended, and the effect of acknowledgement of liability and part payment.

The general principle under Section 3 is that any suit instituted after the prescribed period is time-barred, and the court has no discretion to entertain it, regardless of how meritorious the claim may be on the merits.

Key Limitation Periods for Commercial Claims

For a suit on a contract, the limitation period is three years from the date on which the cause of action arose. For a suit to recover money lent under a written contract, the period is also three years. For a suit for breach of a commercial contract, time typically starts to run from the date of the breach.

For suits relating to immovable property, the period is generally twelve years. For suits to enforce a decree, the period is twelve years from the date of the decree.

For arbitration proceedings, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies the same limitation period as would apply to a suit in court on the same cause of action, by virtue of Section 43 of that Act. This is a point that parties sometimes miss. The fact that a dispute is to be resolved by arbitration does not extend the limitation period.

In commercial disputes, the three-year limitation period starts running from the date the breach occurs, not from the date the aggrieved party discovers it or decides to take action. Delay in pursuing a claim is legally irreversible once the limitation period expires.

When Time Starts to Run

Identifying when time starts to run is often the most contested question in limitation disputes. For a claim for payment, time typically runs from the date on which payment was due and not made. For a claim for breach of a term of a contract, time runs from the date of the breach.

Section 17 of the Limitation Act deals with fraud and mistake. Where a claim is based on the fraud of the defendant, or where the defendant has concealed a fact relevant to the claim, time does not begin to run until the claimant discovers or could with reasonable diligence have discovered the fraud or the concealment.

Acknowledgement and Part Payment

Two important provisions in the Limitation Act can restart the limitation clock. Section 18 provides that where a person acknowledges liability in writing, signed by the person making the acknowledgement or their authorised agent, before the expiry of the limitation period, a fresh period of limitation begins from the date of the acknowledgement.

Section 19 provides a similar effect for part payment. If a debtor makes a part payment before the limitation period expires, a fresh period begins from the date of payment.

These provisions are practically significant. A well-timed written demand, followed by a written acknowledgement of the debt from the other side, can extend the window for initiating proceedings. Businesses should preserve all written communications with debtors, including emails and messages that may amount to acknowledgements of liability.

The Commercial Courts Act

The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 introduced special fast-track courts for commercial disputes above a specified value. While the Act does not alter the limitation periods under the Limitation Act, it does impose strict timelines on the conduct of proceedings once a suit is filed. Parties to a commercial suit filed in a Commercial Court face strict deadlines for filing written statements and completing pleadings, and failure to comply can result in the right to file a defence being forfeited.

Practical Steps

Businesses should not wait until a dispute has escalated to an advanced stage before taking legal advice on limitation. As soon as a breach is identified, or a payment obligation is missed, the clock starts running. Taking legal advice early allows proper assessment of the limitation position and ensures that proceedings, or at minimum a demand letter, are issued before the window closes.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It does not create a lawyer-client relationship. For advice specific to your situation, please consult a qualified legal professional. LawCite Advocates is a law firm registered in India.

Discuss your
legal matter.

Request a Consultation

As per the Bar Council of India Rules, LawCite Advocates is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.